About Me

Name: RANT BRAZEN
Location: Wilmington, NC
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

ARLO SPHINCTER HAS LEFT THE BUILDING

  The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 that profanity on U.S. broadcast television won’t be tolerated anymore. Violators will be persecuted. No, that’s not it – violators will be prosecuted – fined, as it were, for using naughty words.

Suits me. Most television has a heavy smut factor anyway, and cleaning up the cussing might give the airwaves a little class for a change.

But I have one gripe about this development. It will prevent me from going on the networks to express my true feelings about the audacious move by Senator Arlo Sphincter, whose defection weakens GOP ability to hold the Democrats in check at least some of the time. Power corrupts? I think so. And this kind of partisan power is scary.  

Anyway, here is how this weenie justified his decision in a statement to the press:

           STATEMENT BY
  SENATOR ARLO SPHINCTER
I have been a Republican since 1966, best as I can recall. I can't recall much that happened that far back. But I been working real hard for the Party, whose tent is big enough to welcome diverse points of view. But the danged tent is just not big enough for me anymore.

You know, I can’t hardly get a good night’s rest on a cot anyway. Never could. So I had to cut out. The time was right because Barracko-baby – that’s what I like to call him – is the Big Kahuna now, and he can help me with a lot of personal stuff.

“I have been comfortable being a Republican, but my Party has not defined who I am. I don't have much of a clue myself. It’s going to be even worse now that I have sold them out and moved back to the far left where all my good buds reside. I have taken each issue one at a time, and done what I thought was best for me and my cronies. I believe I have been consistent in this regard.

“Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. I have been so lonely out there. Besides that, Ronnie isn’t around anymore to scold me, so I said what the heck, let’s bust a move.

“Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. Do the math. No way I could stick with that stodgy old hoard of GOP tightwads, sexual prudes and enemies of Cuba and our beloved United Nations.

“When I supported the spendulus package, I knew it would get my behind in a rumpus with my old Republican cohorts. But the way I figured, I would make lots of points with the real players in the political schmooze game up here. You gotta do what you gotta do.

“Now I face the future with confidence that I can win in a general election without having to stoop to the humiliation of being in a mud-wrestling primary which I am sure to lose. And I understand that. Why would voters in the GOP hang with a guy who can’t be trusted? But I still have hope that Mitch McConnell, Rush and Newt will invite me back to our Saturday night barbecues which we all used to enjoy together.

“I am not making this decision because there are no important and interesting opportunities outside the Senate. I am doing it because there’s more easy money when you’re on the public dole instead of having to gamble on making it out there where people don’t get paid unless they deserve it.

Finally, remember this – I know I will -- my change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Like always, I’ll be in there chugging along for old Number One. And if the crowd I’m joining up with gets a little nervous over that, I promise you this – I’ll be back. Just leave the light on for me.”

*** THE PREVIOUS FALLACIOUS PRESENTATION BEARS NO RESEMBLANCE TO STUFF SAID BY ANY ACTUAL PERSON LIVING OR DEAD, AS FAR AS I KNOW. IF IT DOES, WELL I’M SORRY.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MAJOR NEW WEB SITE WILL TACKLE WARMING DEBATE

  It is always with some hesitation that I begin to produce a new TH post based on the hard-earned research of another writer. But I launch this piece with every intention of paying full credit and homage to the journalist who has launched an informational enterprise of more than passing note.

Marc Morano is managing editor of a new no-holds-barred Web site that seems destined to become the worst nightmare of our elitist global warming conspirators. I do hope that my excitement over the debut of this meteorological news source is justified. If need equates to realization, those of us who deplore the fantasies and folly of the wide-eyed left-wing radical set will not be disappointed.

The banner under which this potent new global warming debunker will be launched is “ClimateDepot.com”. It is the brainchild of an organization named the “Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which touts the site as “the most comprehensive information center for climate and energy news and information.”

Works for me. Sounds like the answer to a prayer. Morano postulated that ClimateDepot.com will offer U.S. and global Internet communities a side of the climate debate that hasn’t been clearly enunciated as yet.

He promises “an alternative to the mainstream media and the environmental pablum they serve up to their viewers and readers every single day.”

In my book, nothing could be finer. The global warming charade sickens me with its snide leftist dogma and claims of man-made catastrophes. The thing is, eminent scientists (among which I do not number) convince me that it is relatively easy to debunk the charges that modern civilization – its admitted demand for energy, the pollution thus generated, and the dependence on fossil fuels – is the root cause of an alleged cycle of upward spiraling temperatures that will swamp coastal cities, melt polar ice, and doom us all.

I do know that long climate change cycles are documented. No argument there. But I am suspicious of the claim, enunciated with evangelical fervor by the likes of Al Gore, that a warming cycle (if indeed there is one, and this is challenged too by some scientific temperature charts) is driven by man and the industrialized societies that continue to proliferate.

If you have any interest in pulling the plug on this left-wing conspiracy hiding behind a green mask, look no further than some of the recent pronouncements by our president. You know who I’m talking about.

Well, this guy, who seems predisposed to signing onto any scheme that will placate our “friends” in Western Europe, and who stands on foreign soil as he calls his own countrymen “arrogant” – this guy is proving to be the loose cannon that many suspected he would be.

The most telling thing about Obama’s “concern” over the plight of the planet is his naïve belief that pollution, which unquestionably exists, can be reduced by cracking down on Western countries – notably the U.S., of course – while giving a pass to renegade despotic societies like China, one of the most notorious industrial polluters in history. Ain’t going to work.

But back to the ray of factual sunlight promised by Marc Morano and his inspired Internet creation, ClimateDepot.com. While he does have his detractors, who call Morano’s content “disinformation”, why don’t we give it awhile and see if the leftwingers squeal even louder?

If they do, ClimateDepot.com is working. And I’m on board.  

   

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IRISH INVITE FOX INTO HEN HOUSE

 
President Obama – he of the silver tongue, smarmy smile and erring compass – takes his universal happytime message from downtown Prague to South Bend.

He is hooked up to render the May commencement address at Notre Dame, U.S. campus bastion of the Roman Catholic Church.

We all know the reputation of the Fighting Irish – smash-mouth football, green beer and a rock-solid opposition to abortion.

I like and respect Notre Dame athletics, and pull for them whenever they’re playing a team that’s not from North Carolina. The green beer? It’s a goofy novelty. In a bar with poor lighting it could be brown or any other color.

But abortion? And the Catholic respect for life of the unborn and all the rest of us? God bless South Bend, Knute Rockne and the Pope.

Notre Dame has won its reputation fair and square as a fortress against the snarling hoardes of pro-choice. And I salute the Irish Catholics for their stand. Look, if you were resting in your mama’s womb waiting for the call to vacate, which city would you rather be in – South Bend or San Francisco? See what I mean?  

So our quirky president, after rocking the free world in London, Paris and elsewhere, has slipped under the moral radar and is going to campaign at Notre Dame. Why? As he has pointed out to us – he won! And so he presses on.

There are lots of doubts that conservative Christians like myself have about Barack Obama. He has shown his disrespect for the truth enough times to have earned the sobriquet of “fibber”, “phony”, “prevaricator”, or – dare we say it? – “liar”! Well, yes, we dare. We do dare. We double dog do dare!
 
It all makes me wonder what the mamas and poppas of those clear-eyed Catholic youngsters think when they discover that the brass in the front office has invited a fox into the hen house. I think I would cut off the tuition tap faster than you can say "infanticide" and home school my baby right on through a PhD in Ethics.
 
Well, I don’t really have a pit bull in this fight, because I am a Protestant former Episcopalian (which I remained until the denomination of my birth and raising became an abomination of liberalism and even occasional denial of Christ! Now my dollars no longer paper the felt bottom of their collection plate. And my physical condition has noticeably deteriorated due to the absence of weekly kneeling, bowing, standing, sitting, side-bends, rising, squats, bench presses, push-ups, and so forth during every service.

But I feel more comfortable with a less ostentatious display of ecumenical enthusiasm, preferring to offer most of my prayers and worship to the Lord in a more personal and subdued (do not read “less sincere or heartfelt”) way and getting my work-outs in at another time. It’s just the way I like it, and I think that’s okay with God.

But, hey, where did we leave President Obama? Turkey? Well he was in Turkey, as you know. Come to think of it, the man actually is a turkey! Progg? How the heck do you spell that place? Wherever. He was out there defusing our nukes while generously letting all the world’s thugs keep theirs. And since he was kind enough to point out that we are the only ones to have popped an atomic bomb on another country in war, I figure he’s probably suggesting that somebody else ought to at least have the next turn.

But I’ll be danged if I like that idea. Frankly, I don’t really know what our Maximum Leader was saying anyway. I rarely do. I do know that he offers a lot of variety in his speechifying, because since he was coronated, he has not repeated any comments he made during the seventeen years of his campaign.

I’m sorry. I do this every time. The president confuses me so much that I rarely stay on topic, so that by the end of my brief allotted time, I have lost my place on the teleprompter and drifted totally away from where I set out to go. If you’re still with me, pal, it’s you that missed the exit, not me.

But look, like the President has insisted with such eloquence, “I may be wrong, but I’m not far from it.” Oh, yeah. I gotta quit. I want to stop writing before you stop reading. God bless you, good friends.

YUK YUX: He never met a stranger, preferring to hang with people he already knew.   

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA COURTS A WORLD OF TROUBLE

 
 So, you will not let me kill you?
 
This is what I hear when I listen to Russian arguments against a U.S. nuclear missile shield in Eastern Europe. Makes me wonder sometimes if I am really getting it right. But I know I am.
 
We've been talking about defenses to ward off a nuclear attack since the great Ronald Reagan raised the issue in a 1983 speech. He  dubbed the plan his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Propagandists on both sides of the Iron Curtain, though, mocked the idea, calling it "Star Wars". How dare we attempt to protect ourselves from a nuclear holocaust?
 
Before this idea was adanced by President Reagan, the United States and the Soviet Bloc faced one another with ICBM weaponry in a stand-off labeled Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). This doctrine of military strategy was based on deterrence. You blow us up and we'll blow you up. You blow us up even more and you'll get it back double.
 
Did it work? Well, nobody pulled the trigger. It was "Peace Through Strength", another phrase coined during the Reagan years. Our giddy peaceniks got violently nauseated by the presence of nuclear weapons in the American arsenal. We never intended to use them . . . unless. It was gutty, and effective. Had we buckled and dismantled our weaponry, we can expect that the big Russian bear would have had his way with us.
 
I loved Reagan for his honesty, his total saturation in Americanism, and his pluck in frustrating Communist threats and expansionism. I miss him, and wish that our current president had some of the same fortitude and plain-spoken  manner that was Mr. Reagan's diplomatic trademark. But Mr. Obama's powder-puff diplomacy on this his first foray overseas at the helm of the United States government dashes any hope of that.
 
In typical liberal fashion, President Obama cuts the corners off the history books, and ignores the reasons our country was obliged to use force -- maximum force, as it were. The Japanese have always conveniently isolated our use of the atomic bomb from all that had gone before. The war in the Pacific did not begin with deployment of the two atomic bombs on Japan. That is how it ended, with complete capitulation by a helpless and humiliated Japanese war machine. No, the earlier book-end to that tragic war was placed by Tokyo's scurrilous attack on Pearl Harbor -- a massive sniper attack undertaken without a declaration of war. For a country that speaks so boldly of honor, this was a most dishonorable act.
 
So our silver-tongued leader, who struggled to please the world and the American public at the same time, came up short. He also placed the country he leads in jeopardy by promising to begin what amounts to unilateral nuclear disarmament. What was he thinking? There are always renegade governments in the world, which flash cunning grins when they sense a soft underbelly on a country -- a foe -- like the United States.
 
Can we expect greedy, sabre-rattling Russia to gut its nuclear capability? Or even to reduce its chilling warchest? Will Russia promise to comply with an agreement, but refuse verification of its actions? And North Korea. Can we trust this government, which gives us every reason to distrust it? China? India? How long must the list be?
 
Even so, in a speech before 20,000 rock fans in the Czech Republic on his world tour and fashion show, he pledged that America would lead the way in finally achieving the goal of abolishing all nuclear weapons. He found it necessary to add that, since the U.S. is the only nation to have used an atom bomb in war, we have a "moral responsibility" to act now.
 
A leader who apparently would be mute without his ever-present phalanx of teleprompters, the president will be hard-pressed to reconsider his glib outbursts as a slip of the tongue. At the same time, he should know that with the immediate worldwide distribution of live news, the good old days of saying one thing for the Europeans and another thing for the home folks are gone.
 
No, this guy to me comes off as scary. I think he would give away the farm in a heartbeat, and later deny that he did it. The world stage ain't Southside Chicago, babes. Shoot your mouth off out here and the pop gun somebody aims at you may be a 20-inch cannon. Do some more homework, Barack. You may think you're speaking for all of us, but I can promise that you're not speaking for me.  And, in that regard, I may be just one of a big crowd.
 
 Time to come home, sir. Don't lose your passport, or you'll be just another illegal immigrant.
 
YUK YUX:  Things are more like they are now than they've ever been before.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ON CONGRESS, CHEERLEADERS AND 'EDUCATION'

We're getting killed in Congress. We may win the debate. But we don't have the numbers to win the contest. It's sort of like having the best cheerleading squad in town, but not getting points on the scoreboard. The outcome is predictable.

The nation is changing. The world as well. It's 2009. Ronald Reagan is gone. Jesse Helms is gone. William F. Buckley is gone. Values are being warped. Morals are eroding. Instant information means nothing stands still. Realities morph before our eyes. What we knew ten minutes ago doesn't exist anymore. It's dizzying. But somehow we have to keep up.

Most of our kids don't know or care why our nation was created. They don't have a clue about geography. They think the Carpel Tunnel is a new shortcut from Manhattan to Brooklyn.They think the Bermuda Triangle has four sides. They think "Taipei" has something to do with personality -- "He's always so hyper. Just totally Taipei."

It galls me, though, to have American kids ridiculed by the world for being naive. Provincial. Shallow. Because my take is that this has been a conspiracy formulated by America's enemies -- enemies from within and around the globe. Conspiracy? Yes, I think so.
 
Those who engineer such campaigns are often our own liberals. They gain power if they can entice large groups of people to stampede one way or the other like herds of cattle impatient to reach the slaughter pens. They want the American "electorate" weakened, deprived of knowledge, unable to discern threats to our country, whether the threats are military, environmental, economic, political, or even spiritual.
 
 We all have had teachers whom we have never forgotten -- wise, warm human beings whom we revered and trusted, who related to us as individuals and spurred us to do our best. I fondly recall a number of professors like this. And I will always be grateful for their concern, encouragement and guidance. But they are definitely in the minority. And, for our liberties and way of life, that situation is ominous.
 
If we can deprive several generations of an appreciation of our own national ideals, and cause them to feel a disconnect from our elected "public servants", then we may be more readily swayed by the cynicism, jealousies, and malevolence of other nations, other cultures, other types of governments, other faiths.
 
Cut out the history. Gut the curriculum of geography. Bury civics. Perhaps worst of all, "dumb down" teaching, academic standards, expectations of scholastic performance, the pursuit of excellence, and the penalty of failure even when  clearly deserved. This has happened, and we are fast going down that road each and every day.
 
The world is watching this sorry drama play out. Much of that world does not wish us well, and in fact relishes a new American ambivalence toward our own proud history, which our detractors may characterize as a flush of arrogance. And that it may well be.
 
But I began by lamenting that conservative Christian Republicans are getting aced in congressional elections. We at Townhall.com must continue to wage the war of ideas, information, persuasion and intellectual currency. Each of us should study the voting records of our respective home state senators and congressmen, track them with tenacity, decode the patterns of their politics, and understand where they are vulnerable. This includes those who are champions of our own particular causes and objectives, and those who are alien to our stand on those issues.
 
We are out here where the rubber meets the road, friends. We have a purpose. A role of considerable value to perform. We can figure out and report to our champions what they can do to gain better traction. And we can reveal where liberals, pro-abortion types, pacifists, and the anti-God squads have vulnerabilities that can be exploited to their political doom.
 
Well, this has been fun. But we have a job to do. Let's get together and do it.
 

YUK YUX:  Remember the woman who had 14 kids? That was an exercise in fertility!

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RANT BRAZEN IS RANTING

Rant Brazen at your service. I think it was Skep41 who said that new blogs are scarce these days. Heck, Skep, these are lean times, you know? There's a dang shortage of everything. He also suggested that we, the harried hoardes of Bobbieville, are getting satisfied with Barocco Bomber. Well, I know Skep, and you know Skep, and he doesn't really believe that. There's just too much bone here to gnaw on.
 
Two reasons I have not offered up any deathless prose of late. One is I have had a ball promoting a friend of mine -- 88, deaf, and a flat-out great artist. But he has never presented his work to the public. So it was easy stirring up a lot of attention for him in the media. During my working years, that is how I made my grocery money, as a publicist and public relations hack. Working in politics much of the time, I had become adept enough at my trade (some call it a profession, others a racket) that I could quietly produce stories and get them in the media, then disappear before anyone knew where they had come from. I was a stealth bomber. If anyone knew I was behind the story, I had failed. I got famous for being unknown. 

 
Now the stuff I do in retirement is much more benign, and frankly more rewarding to me. My real drive is to write, but I like now to write about people who pursue their lives in relative obscurity, but who deserve time in the spotlight because they have become specialists in some trade or craft. Nobody, though, knows about them, and the attention and care they give to using the talents God has given them. It's a lot of fun discovering these individuals and showing a genuine interest in what they do. And if I then do my job good enough, the story that results will get on the Internet or television or in the papers. No, strike that last one. Newspapers are disappearing. And since most of them are and always have been controlled by liberal twits, I am mostly not upset to see them go.
 
Another reason I have not produced any blogs recently is that I have spent too much time reading the work of my fellow blogsters here on TH. And this has not been good for me. Because I fancy myself dang good at writing, and especially at skewering political enemies of our great America, my research has shown me that there are a whole crowd of patriotic writers and bloggers out there who turn a phrase that I can say I truly admire. This resulted in my developing an inferiority complex that led to a rash, after which some of my hair fell out. But, you know, if every great conservative political commentator had to have a big, thick mane and a complexion like a baby, we wouldn't have Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, or William Buckley. Hair and glowing cheeks just ain't where it's at.
 
Look, I say these things because our beloved Bobbieville is truly peopled with a cadre of distinguished and patriotic political scribes who are ready for the major leagues. It makes me feel proud to be a part of this, and to have a voice that seems to matter. One of our bloggers or blogettes said that, even if only our little "band of bloggers" (I like that. Might have been Bobbie who coined that one) were the only ones to read our stuff, the effort will not have been wasted. We encourage one another, and test our theories and beliefs in public.
 
But whoa Nellie -- anything that goes on the WWW has the potential for global exposure. So we know not where our deathless prose goes, or who may be taking it in at any given moment. I think all of us are really relishing the art and science of sounding off in America. I know I do. And I think that each of us has the potential to be a headliner, and command the attention of the masses. Wait a minute, I don't like the way that last pronouncement came off. I hate for people to be referred to that way. Maybe I'll amend it to say that we each have the stuff to get folks to listen in. That would be more gooder.
 
Look, friends, I'll be readin' ya. I'll be hollerin' and clappin' and givin' you a standing "O". And if my junk has any appeal at all, check in once in awhile when you run out of stuff to do. God bless you each and every one. You're my kind of people. Always will be. Good night to all from historic Wilmington, NC, where the 2009 Azalea Festival is truly going to be unfurled this week-end! You're invited, you know, and you can all stay at our place just one block off the Cape Fear River.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »